OkiStyle│AtoZ

Okinawa AtoZ

Greenpeace golden rice

Heiwa Kinen Koen Golden rice relies upon the bodies ability to convert beta carotene to Vitamin A. More Than 100 Nobel Laureates Call Out Greenpeace For Anti-GMO Obstruction In Developing World. The Chinese government reacted quickly. According to The Washington Post , one of the motivations for Greenpeace’s campaign against Golden Rice, in the opinion of signers of the letter, was that spreading fear about bioengineered crops helps raise money for their cause. Golden Rice is like a vitamin pill in a grain of rice. "reject Greenpeace's campaign against Golden Rice specifically, and crops and foods improved through biotechnology in general; and to do everything in their power to oppose Greenpeace's actions and accelerate the access of farmers to all the tools of modern biology, especially seeds improved through biotechnology. Do we need Golden Rice at all? Von Hernandez is currently the Executive Director of Greenpeace Southeast Asia and was awarded the Goldman Environmental Prize in 2003. The Genetic Engineering (GE) industry claims vitamin A rice could save thousands of children from blindness and millions of malnourished people from vitamin A deficiency (VAD) related diseases. 2. … Andrew Revkin on Greenpeace role in fighting Golden Rice: I’ve been a fan of Greenpeace’s creative, but legal, work to press big companies over destructive forest practices. 54 Only Tang's 2012 research with gmo Golden Rice was criticized by Greenpeace. They need new causes to keep fundraising humming along - and that has to be the reason they oppose Golden Rice. In 2016, an open letter signed by 100 Nobel Laureates directly called on "Greenpeace to cease and desist in its campaign against Golden Rice specifically, and crops and foods improved through A scientist shows golden rice and ordinary rice at the laboratory of the International Rice Research Institute, south of Manila, the capital of the Philippines, on Aug. Greenpeace and their allies have claimed falsely that GMOS are dangerous, untested and inadequately regulated. Field trials are now underway in the Philippines and Bangladesh with the hope of introducing it to the market by 2015. Then when Greenpeace-inspired and probably funded urban activists, pretending to be farmers, destroyed the field trial of Golden Rice in the Philippines on Aug 8, 2013. D. The rice is genetically enhanced to produce the vitamin A precursor beta-carotene, giving it a golden color. Golden rice has the potential to save many lives and prevent blindness in children throughout the world, although it has not been widely adopted yet. 04/07/2016 · And both GMWatch and Greenpeace fail to mention (or deny) the fact that one of the major reasons that Golden Rice isn't yet on the market is that anti-GMO groups have worked very hard to block it It has been demonstrated in numerous studies that golden rice can eliminate vitamin A deficiency. The agency is testing golden rice to see if it is indeed safe for the environment and human consumption. The organization Allow Golden Rice Now! reported on its website that Greenpeace s 14-year effort to prevent Golden Rice from being produced and reaching those who suffer from VAD constitutes a crime against humanity, as defined by the Rome Statute. "Fool's gold," Greenpeace called it. Henry I. Ingo Potrykus, creator of the 'Golden Rice' in response to Greenpeace's Internet release "GENETICALLY ENGINEERED 'GOLDEN RICE' IS FOOL'S GOLD" from 9 February 2001 (see below for that text). The so-called, “golden rice”, which has been genetically engineered to produce beta carotene, has led to opposition from GMO opponents, including Greenpeace. Groups like Greenpeace are trying to stop Golden Rice, a life-saving invention that could help solve the serious problem of vitamin A deficiency, from being accepted and implemented. If these children in the world’s poorest regions could eat Golden Rice instead of traditional rice they would be prevented from suffering VAD, from “Greenpeace has spearheaded opposition to Golden Rice, which has the potential to reduce or eliminate much of the death and disease caused by a vitamin A deficiency (VAD), which has the greatest Andrew Revkin on Greenpeace role in fighting Golden Rice: I’ve been a fan of Greenpeace’s creative, but legal, work to press big companies over destructive forest practices. Vitamin A enriched rice (Golden Rice) is a cost-efficient solution that can substantially reduce health costs. Roberts said that, by his count, there are 296 living laureates. Moore inspires new ways of thinking about our environmental challenges. It might be the case that the Hunan researchers cut some corners, as Greenpeace alleges, and a Tufts ethics committee is currently looking into that. An informed, provocative speaker, Dr. MANILA —. Helping to convince governments and the population as a whole the importance of protecting the rainforests and biodiversity, to stress the need for renewable energy, and to condemn the gruesome act of whale hunting – to name just a few things they’ve done. Activist groups, such as Greenpeace and GM Freeze, are lobbying together with examples of the unjust health effects this tiny rice grain brings to gain momentum and support when opposing Golden Rice. Greenpeace is by far the most active and powerful opponent of Golden Rice. Greenpeace does not believe malnutrition will be solved by Golden Rice, and …“Greenpeace has spearheaded opposition to Golden Rice, which has the potential to reduce or eliminate much of the death and disease caused by a vitamin A deficiency (VAD), which has the greatest The letter also singles out a specific engineered rice variety, Golden Rice, and asks Greenpeace “to cease and desist in its campaign against Golden Rice”. From the organizers: The aim of the campaign is to convince Greenpeace that it should make an exception to its immoral and lethal zero-tolerance position on genetic modification – and allow and support the distribution of Golden Rice, on humanitarian grounds. The letter calls on Greenpeace to abandon its campaign against GMF in general, and “golden rice” in particular, and calls on governments to reject the Greenpeace campaign. What reasons do they give for their opposition?31/10/2014 · ‘Golden' rice is a genetically engineered (GE) rice variety that has been developed by industry to produce pro-vitamin A. Normal rice contains vitamin A, but it is lost in the processing necessary to make rice edible. Activists recently attacked and destroyed a field of “golden rice” in Pili, Camarines Sur in the Philippines. In 2001, Greenpeace pointed out that, in addition to environmental and human health concerns of golden rice, the low concentrations of beta-carotene present meant that people would need to consume <p>Patrick Moore, an original founding member of Greenpeace, is in a public fight with the group over it&#39;s anti-Golden Rice stance. Greenpeace has waged a decade-long campaign against golden rice because it involves transgenic technology. NORTH VANCOUVER — It didn’t seem like a fair fight. Golden Rice Humanitarian Board) comments on how Greenpeace and other Greenpeace opposes the release of GE crops, including GE 'Golden' rice, into the environment. Chemicals The “Devel’s Element” Greenpeace’s unwarranted mistrust of chemicals is nearly as old as the group itself. Every major science and health organization supports Golden Rice. Greenpeace Philippines is already working with NGO partners and farmers in the Philippines to boost climate resiliency. 3 kilograms in dry …The best place for video content of all kinds. So golden rice will be a help to the world’s poor. Dr Tang, with 25 years' experience of similar research, and co-workers had previously conducted similar research with Golden Rice in USA with adults,53 and with children in China with other, non GMO-crop sources of beta-carotene. Greenpeace co-founder Dr. Gollden Rice has been high on the agenda of activists like Greenpeace, approach to preventing VAD is a group of genetically engineered rice varieties known as Golden Rice because of its color The letter asks Greenpeace to cease its efforts to block the introduction of genetically engineered Golden Rice. In Greenpeace's opinion, the tens of millions of dollars invested in the development and promotion of GM 'Golden rice' would have been better spent in supporting solutions that work. Vitamin A deficiency . Greenpeace and GMO. Nevertheless, time passed without much headlining news from the Golden Rice Project, until June 2016, when 110 Laureates (out of the living 296 Nobel Laureates) among 5591 scientists and citizens signed a letter against Greenpeace’s opposition to genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and in …Earlier this year, scientists disclosed in the journal Nature Biotechnology the development of a new Golden Rice, a genetically engineered form of the crop capable of producing 23 times more provitamin A (beta-carotene) than a prototype announced in the year 2000 (Paine et al. Der Greenpeace-Aussteiger hat mit seiner Familie und der seines Bruders Michael, einem Musiker und PR-Berater, die „Allow Golden Rice Society“ gegründet. Despite Haerlin's apparently Damascene conversion, however, Greenpeace itself continues to play down the benefits of Golden Rice, claiming, for example, that an adult would need to consume 3. Vitamin A deficiency (VAD) causes blindness and the death of 2 million children every year in the poorest regions of the world. Controversy. The World Health Organization estimates that 250 million people, suffer from VAD,Two humanitarian scientists, Ingo Potrykus and Peter Beyer, used their knowledge of genetics to create Golden Rice, a variety of rice that contains beta carotene, the essential nutrient that we Introducing the Golden-Rice trait into dozens (or even perhaps hundreds) of varieties is not too onerous a task. In fact, Greenpeace’s activism against golden rice has caused tensions within the NGO. It is intended to produce a fortified food to be grown and consumed in areas with a shortage of dietary vitamin A, a deficiency which each year is estimated to kill 670,000 children under the age of 5 and cause an additional Greenpeace itself admits its problem with Golden Rice is the Monsanto link rather than the GMOs themselves and as such their position is myopic. By Patrick Moore, PhD. In India, Vandana Shiva, an environmental activist and adviser to the government, called golden rice “a hoax” that is “creating hunger and malnutrition, not solving it. Leveraging its drastic opposition to all genetically-modified foods, the activist group has successfully advanced the Trojan Horse argument that if Golden Rice is allowed to take root then the door will be open to GMOs of every stripe. They claim Golden Rice is a failed solution because it still isn’t available for sale. ” It might be that. Golden Rice would provide enough beta carotene in a single serving to end Vitamin A deficiency in children&#39;s diets, which he says kills 2 million children a year. Golden rice could be deemed safe and approved by the Philippine government as early as the end of this year, Zeigler says—but the efficacy trials could take another 18 months. It punished three Chinese co-authors of the study, removing them from their jobs. The International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) was pleased that the international advocacy group Greenpeace took up its invitation for representatives to visit the institute on Monday, 19 March. 7 kilos (dry weight) of the rice in order to receive the recommended daily amount of vitamin A. September 10, 2012 “If you plan to destroy test fields to prevent responsible testing and development of Golden Rice for humanitarian purposes, you will be accused of contributing to a crime against humanity. Most of the world take the word of Greenpeace as gospel. Hennessy , D. Greenpeace said it believed that golden rice was an irresponsible and dangerous way to address Vitamin A deficiency because it did not address the underlying causes of the deficiency, which were He acts as a campaign spokesman for Allow Golden Rice Now, an initiative aiming to convince Greenpeace and its allies to stop opposing Golden Rice as a cure for vitamin A deficiency. Greenpeace has staged public protests against Golden Rice, and it opposes all genetically modified organisms. and Moschini , G. Golden Rice Study Violated Ethical Rules, But when the study was published last year, anti-biotech campaigners at Greenpeace China immediately called it a scandal, It is irresponsible to impose GE ‘Golden’ rice as a quick remedy to people on the frontlines and who do not welcome it, particularly when there are safe and effective options already available. A humanitarian effort started in 1990 [2] , Golden Rice has been modified to produce beta-carotene in the grains. Golden Rice targets the areas where rice is 80% of food consumption. Recent Posts Paris Press Release June 17 You may also want to read Adrian Dubock's (Executive Secretary, Golden Rice Humanitarian Board) comments on how Greenpeace and other GMO critics misrepresent the Golden Rice Humanitarian Project at the Genetic Literacy Project site: "Disembedding grain: Golden Rice, The Green Revolution, and heirloom seeds in the Philippines" ‘All that Glitters is not Gold’ features various communities’ representatives concerned about the introduction of genetically engineered ‘Golden’ rice in the Philippines. “‘Golden’ rice does not address the underlying causes of [vitamin A deficiency], which are mainly poverty and lack of access to a healthy and varied diet,” Greenpeace claimed on its website. Vitamin A deficiency kills hundreds of thousands around the world, and Golden Rice is an affordable, healthy solution to this growing problem. In A Grain Of Golden Rice, a campaigner for Greenpeace in China. Earlier this year, scientists disclosed in the journal Nature Biotechnology the development of a new Golden Rice, a genetically engineered form of the crop capable of producing 23 times more provitamin A (beta-carotene) than a prototype announced in the year 2000 (Paine et al. Notably absent from the latest list of campaigners against Golden Rice is the international environmental group Greenpeace, which in the past has attracted severe criticism for its opposition to the project. “Greenpeace has spearheaded opposition to Golden Rice, which has the potential to reduce or eliminate much of the death and disease caused by a Vitamin A deficiency (VAD), which has the greatest impact on the poorest people in Africa and Southeast Asia,” the letter said. Ingo Potrykus, creator of the 'Golden Rice' in response to Greenpeace's Internet release "GENETICALLY ENGINEERED 'GOLDEN RICE' IS FOOL'S …Golden Rice has yet to be tested on people and the environment causing concerns for the health and ethical social worlds. ) As the Philippine government prepares to rule on whether or not to allow farmers to grow the wonder-crop, the anti-GMO movement is digging itself in for a fight. Andrew Revkin on Greenpeace role in fighting Golden Rice: I’ve been a fan of Greenpeace’s creative, but legal, work to press big companies over destructive forest practices. I know that's not the point of the video, but even if Greenpeace would be indifferent about Golden Rice the consumers still have to accept the new rice. org ===== ===== For Immediate Release 9 February 2001 Greenpeace demands false biotech advertising be removed from TV (Toronto) Greenpeace is filing a complaint with Advertising Standards Canada demanding that 07/03/2019 · IRRI Golden Rice which has been genetically engineered to have higher levels of the vitamin A precursor beta-carotene is finally about be to approved for planting by poor …Introducing the Golden-Rice trait into dozens (or even perhaps hundreds) of varieties is not too onerous a task. Dr Patrick Moore was one of the founding members of the NGO back in the early 70s, but since his dissent in 1986 he has emerged as a vehement critic ofThank you Greenpeace Eye Rounds For saving me from Golden Rice from Facebook tagged as MemeWhile genetically modified golden rice could help alleviate famine and save thousands of children from malnourishment and visual impairments, this simple solution is strongly opposed by Greenpeace, which has initiated two misleading campaigns, two Swedish researchers wrote in an opinion piece. Greenpeace states that “genetically-engineered rice is a technological fix Moore was an early member of Greenpeace in the 1970s and early 80s, but has since become a critic of the group’s stance on a range of issues, including golden rice. And that is far more of a problem than the anti-GMO behavior of Greenpeace. Golden rice did not attack the underlying problem of poverty, Greenpeace said; besides, other, better solutions to vitamin A deficiency existed. Golden Rice is a genetically modified rice producing beta-carotene (beta-carotene is converted to Vitamin A in the human body) in high concentration. Greenpeace has said the golden rice project is an attempt at finding a poster boy for the GM cause and says it opposes all releases of GM technology into the environment. Patrick Moore, leader of the campaign. Yet, despite the cost in human lives, anti-GM campaigners – from Greenpeace to Naomi Klein – have derided efforts to use golden rice to avoid vitamin A deficiency. This comparison is not a simplistic It is more a humanitarian issue than activism for the sake of it, said Dr Patrick Moore, noted environmentalist and former Greenpeace activist who feels that Golden rice as a rich source of Vitamin A is highly suited for developing nationsafter observing the Greenpeace anti-GMO beliefs for a long while, they are scientifically literate about golden rice, which saves children's lives. Scientists in the Philippines are at work on a strain of rice that could solve one of the world’s major health challenges: a vitamin A deficiency. Golden Rice proponent Patrick Moore has used Twitter, YouTube and other media to blame environmental groups, such as Greenpeace, for prolonging the suffering of children with Vitamin A deficiencies. I vowed to get up and do something. Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ), Golden Rice is a genetically modified rice producing beta-carotene (beta-carotene is converted to Vitamin A in the human body) in high concentration. Greenpeace opposes the release of GE crops, including ‘Golden’ rice, into the environment. It won't overcome malnutrition. ” DDT. </p>Two humanitarian scientists, Ingo Potrykus and Peter Beyer, used their knowledge of genetics to create Golden Rice, a variety of rice that contains beta carotene, the essential nutrient that we Dr Patrick Moore co-founder of Greenpeace, the multinational environmental NGO, and now its fierce critic, was in New Delhi for his campaign ‘Allow Golden Rice Now. Greenpeace on golden rice. To drive the point home, an activist in the Philippines sat down behind a giant mound of golden rice during a press conference. In 2001, Greenpeace pointed out that, in addition to environmental and human health concerns of golden rice, the low concentrations of beta-carotene present meant that people would need to consume Abstract. Greenpeace says that there are ‘better’ alternatives to Golden Rice. But so was the nuclear bomb. ( 2006 ), ‘ Regulatory actions under adjustment costs and the resolution of scientific uncertainty ’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88 : 308 – 323 . Dr Patrick Moore is an internationally renowned ecologist and environmentalist. Greenpeace believes that ‘Golden’ rice is not an answer to Vitamin A deficiency (VAD) and malnutrition, and diverts resources away from dealing with the real underlying causes of VAD, which are mainly poverty and lack of access to a more diverse diet. "At a Greenpeace, Don't Ignore the Sociology of GM. Greenpeace calculations show that an adult would have to eat at least 3. A breast feeding woman would have to eat at least 6. If these children in the world’s poorest regions could eat Golden Rice instead of traditional rice they would be prevented from suffering VAD, from As mentioned, Greenpeace has been a major scaremonger and leader in sowing doubt. The letter also singles out a specific engineered rice variety, Golden Rice, and asks Greenpeace “to cease and desist in its campaign against Golden Rice”. But the exact metabolic pathway is poorly misunderstood and negative health effects can result from an overexposure to beta carotene. Its proponents have hyped GE 'Golden' rice as a quick-fix solution to Author: Greenpeace InternationalViews: 44K107 Nobel laureates sign letter blasting Greenpeace over https://www. Greenpeace has opposed the adoption of Golden Rice—a genetically modified strain of rice that contains vitamin A—as a source of food in the third world. IRRI welcomes the better understanding subsequently shown by Greenpeace regarding research into Golden Rice. MILES O’BRIEN: He is leader of the golden rice project at the Philippines Department of Agriculture Rice Research Institute, more commonly known as PhilRice. ARTICLE: Golden Rice: The GMO crop Greenpeace hates and humanitarians love. Golden Rice is far from being a sustainable solution to vitamin deficiency - it encourages a diet based solely on rice. Greenpeace or Golden War? 26 April,2010 Dr. ( 2006 ), ‘ Regulatory actions under …Benedikt Haerlin, International Coordinator of Greenpeace’s Genetic Engineering Campaign, has this to say about the golden rice initiative. Greenpeace has made a concerted effort to block Golden Rice’s introduction since it was announced in 2000. ” Golden rice was created by a non-profit with plans to distribute the rice for free in the developing world but, according to scientists, protests by Greenpeace have interfered with its development. “Human guinea pigs”, “gambling with health” and “shadowy research project”—the terms came thick and fast in Greenpeace’s revelation about Golden Rice earlier this year. Please read the sidebar below for our rules. Golden rice is a variety of rice (Oryza sativa) produced through genetic engineering to biosynthesize beta-carotene, a precursor of vitamin A, in the edible parts of rice. By 2002, Golden Rice was technically ready to go. The Philippines and Bangladesh are moving closer towards commercialization of the GMO food crop to combat vitamin A deficiency, a serious public health issue in Asia. “Rather than invest in this overpriced public relations exercise, we need to address malnutrition through a more Environmentalists are not the ones opposing golden rice. Greenpeace’s opposition to genetically modified foods has drawn criticism from the scientific community. With Greenpeace activists screaming to poor farmers that golden rice will kill their children, it’s going to be a long, tough slog for golden rice. Greenpeace has waged a decade-long campaign against golden rice because it involves transgenic technology. “GM ‘golden’ rice represents a propaganda campaign aiming to gain greater acceptance of corporate-owned GM products in the Global South,” Thompson said. </p>Greenpeace has spearheaded opposition to Golden Rice, which has the potential to reduce or eliminate much of the death and disease caused by a vitamin A deficiency (VAD), which has the greatest impact on the poorest people in Africa and Southeast Asia. Golden rice, which is modified with Why Greenpeace is Wrong about GMOs and Golden Rice: Greenpeace has led a global campaign to mislead consumers about GMOs and Golden Rice. This is a crime against humanity,” stated Dr. Global Ideas Golden Rice: a shining solution, or an impending danger? Beta-carotene enriched Golden Rice is a much touted humanitarian solution to widespread Vitamin A deficiency in poor countries. "Golden Rice: The GMO crop Greenpeace hates and humanitarians love Viewpoint: Farmers’ crops are failing, and Europe's precautionary assault on neonicotinoid insecticides is to blame RecommendedGreenpeace has campaigned against golden rice for more than a decade, saying that it is an unnecessary diversion from the real causes of vitamin-A deficiency. Greenpeace has blocked Golden Rice using public pressure, and that is the only way they will be convinced to change their position and make an exception for Golden Rice. Greenpeace is opposed to golden rice because it has been developed through genetic medication by incorporating a gene from maize that produces beta-carotene which is a cure for Vitamin A deficiency. Greenpeace has upped its offensive against Golden Rice this year, claiming it is a Trojan horse to soften the public opposition to GMOs that Greenpeace itself has helped create. Anti-GMO activists argue that an increase in GMOs will cause the degradation of foods to the point where everything that we eat will be artificial and genetically engineered. For the sake of readability, I have replaced every instance of “GE ‘Golden’ rice” with “Golden Rice” in quotations from the Greenpeace website. 04/07/2016 · And both GMWatch and Greenpeace fail to mention (or deny) the fact that one of the major reasons that Golden Rice isn't yet on the market is that anti-GMO groups have worked very hard to block it Despite a lack of evidence showing any ill effects in humans, Greenpeace holds a staunch position against Golden Rice. (2013) adult life as blinds before Greenpeace abandon their Golden Rice is genetically modified to provide beta-carotene in the rice grain and it could potentially address widespread Vitamin A deficiency in poor countries where rice is a staple. ” Jon Entine of ForbesWe are calling on the countries that are Party to the Rome Protocol to investigate this situation with an eye to taking Greenpeace before the International Criminal …Greenpeace has upped its offensive against Golden Rice this year, claiming it is a Trojan horse to soften the public opposition to GMOs that Greenpeace itself has helped create. Golden Rice, a vitamin-fortified product, is clearly needed by millions of poor children, which shows that environmental groups opposed to it such as Greenpeace are in a war on developing nations. Greenpeace has been characterising the Golden Rice project as "international deception. Greenpeace encouraged that shift, that other countries can adopt if they lack their own version of the FDA. 2005). Greenpeace has spearheaded opposition to Golden Rice, which has the potential to reduce or eliminate much of the death and disease caused by a vitamin A deficiency (VAD), which has the greatest impact on the poorest people in Africa and Southeast Asia. Potrykus and its Humanitarian …22/01/2014 · Greenpeace (2012), Golden Illusion: The Broken Promises of ‘Golden’ Rice, Amsterdam: Greenpeace International. Greenpeace’s Crime Against Humanity. Greenpeace’s hysteria over golden rice caused its co-founder, who split from the organization, to label the campaign a “crime against humanity. Greenpeace co-founder supports GMO Golden Rice. Greenpeace claimed that the amount of beta-carotene in Golden Rice was so small that one would need to consume massive quantities of rice to reach an effective dose. ” Oct. Golden Rice Humanitarian Board) comments on how Greenpeace and other Sep 26, 2017 Gollden Rice has been high on the agenda of activists like Greenpeace, a $360 million-plus per year behemoth with offices in more than 40 Nov 15, 2013 Groups like Greenpeace are trying to stop Golden Rice, a life-saving invention that could help solve the serious problem of vitamin A deficiency, 30 Jun 2016 In response, Wilhelmina Pelegrina, Campaigner at Greenpeace 'Golden' rice has failed as a solution and isn't currently available for sale, 13 Feb 2018 The group echoes many of the worries about Golden Rice that environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs), led by Greenpeace, 30 Jun 2016 In a separate post Why Greenpeace is Wrong about GMOs and Golden Rice, the campaign accuses Greenpeace of spearheading "opposition Golden rice is a variety of rice (Oryza sativa) produced through genetic engineering to . Despite Golden Rice being available since early 2000, this rice has not been introduced in any country. Much like the DDT/malaria controversy, Greenpeace is fighting against a modern solution on simply a knee-jerk basis. While activists did destroy one Golden Rice test plot in a 2013 protest, it is unlikely that this action had any significant impact on the approval of Golden Rice. It has been modified by inserting a gene from maize and a gene from bacteria found in soil which allows the plant to biosynthesise beta-carotene in the edible parts of rice. There’s no denying that Golden Rice – as other genetically modified organisms (GMOs) – is an astounding scientific feat. Ex-Greenpeace president says group's opposition to genetically-modified Golden Rice costing thousands of lives. But they are fuzzy (deliberately) on what they are, and there is no indication about what they have done to popularise them. It has been noted that Golden Rice does not provide enough Vitamin A, 1. This means a normal daily intake of 300 grams of rice would, at best, provide 8 percent of the vitamin A needed daily. Greenpeace's opposition to Golden rice not justified Dr Patrick Moore, former Greenpeace activist explaining the importance of Golden Rice in Indian context on March 16, 2015 at Delhi According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Vitamin A deficiency (VAD) is the leading cause of preventable blindness in children and increases the risk of disease and death from severe infections. The World Health Organization estimates that between a quarter and half a million go blind every year because of Vitamin A deficiency and that about two million people die because of impaired There was a time when Green peace was driven by a much more even keeled and pure vision. 7 kilograms of dry weight rice, which results in about nine kilograms of cooked rice, to satisfy their daily need of vitamin A from Golden Rice. He Funding is provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and other international and philanthropic donors. It is hardly the only group that opposes GMOs, but it has a robust global presence, and the laureates in their letter contend that Greenpeace has led the effort to block Golden Rice. Their strategy is misleading the public, they are oversimplifying the actual problems in combating vitamin A deficiency and try to turn down other, more effective solutions," says Christoph Then, Greenpeace International GE campaigner. ’Recently, news broke out that the locally grown variant of this modified rice, called Golden Rice, was being uprooted from the fields because of massive opposition by certain groups. Gollden Rice has been high on the agenda of activists like Greenpeace, approach to preventing VAD is a group of genetically engineered rice varieties known as Golden Rice because of its color “Greenpeace has spearheaded opposition to Golden Rice, which has the potential to reduce or eliminate much of the death and disease caused by a Vitamin A deficiency (VAD), which has the greatest impact on the poorest people in Africa and Southeast Asia,” the letter said. Golden Rice: The GMO crop Greenpeace hates and humanitarians love Paul McDivitt | Genetic Literacy Project | February 13, 2018 Hopefully this is the last time I ever use this stock image. But many argue the golden grains are only meant to improve the image . 30 Jun 2016 The letter asks Greenpeace to cease its efforts to block introduction of a Greenpeace has spearheaded opposition to Golden Rice, which has Greenpeace has led a global campaign to mislead consumers about GMOs and Golden Rice. If they want to lobby for greater corporate Golden Rice proves them wrong, so they need to discredit it any way they can. A scientist shows golden rice and ordinary rice at the laboratory of the International Rice Research Institute, south of Manila, the capital of the Philippines, on Aug. But Greenpeace is clearly a big-money operation these days, as intent as feeding itself as any corporation is. Monsanto is absent from Greenpeace’s list of major funders of golden rice, which suggests that Shiva wishes to evoke the notion of the monolithic control of Big Agriculture by associating golden rice with Monsanto, a company that stands as a figure of corporate greed and irresponsibility for many people (King et al. The list of signatories had risen to 107 names by Wednesday morning. , 2010, 23). Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore has taken on a herculean task; convincing Greenpeace to place innocent lives before radical ideology. Greenpeace to Nobel Laureates: It’s Not Our Fault Golden Rice Has ‘Failed as a Solution’. Moore’s campaign extols the virtues of Golden Rice proponent Patrick Moore has used Twitter, YouTube and other media to blame environmental groups, such as Greenpeace, for prolonging the suffering of children with Vitamin A deficiencies. “If Golden Rice were a cure for cancer, malaria, or Ebola, it would have been approved 10 years ago. Ingo Portykus , genetically modified , GMO , golden rice , vitamin A Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Greenpeace vs. 31, 2014. Why Greenpeace is Wrong about GMOs and Golden Rice. Greenpeace has spearheaded opposition to Golden Rice, which has the potential to reduce or eliminate much of the death and disease caused by a vitamin A deficiency (VAD), which has the greatest impact on the poorest people in Africa and Southeast Asia. The plot that was destroyed was one of 15 spread throughout the Philippines. Contributions to Greenpeace Fund, Inc. Avid anti-GM Rice organizations like Greenpeace , along with some Filipino unions are against it, implying that Golden Rice is only a marketing strategy and a sales pitch. Greenpeace has led a global campaign to mislead consumers about GMOs and Golden Rice. Greenpeace was targeted Wednesday by more than 100 Nobel laureates who have signed a letter calling on the environmental group to end its campaign against genetically modified organisms (GMOs). In 2014 Dr. " Patrick Moore, Ph. are tax-deductible. He said Greenpeace has argued that Golden Rice is a Trojan horse, taking the view that “if Golden Rice is allowed to succeed, that will be a justification for all GMOs to be introduced,” he said. In fact, he's created a movement – Allow Golden Rice Now - in opposition to the efforts to stop the crop. Greenpeace and their allies have claimed falsely that GMOS are Jun 30, 2016 In a separate post Why Greenpeace is Wrong about GMOs and Golden Rice, the campaign accuses Greenpeace of spearheading "opposition Jun 30, 2016 The letter asks Greenpeace to cease its efforts to block introduction of a Greenpeace has spearheaded opposition to Golden Rice, which has Similarly, GMO Golden Rice provides a source of vitamin A. 5 The Tide Turns Against Greenpeace . Barry Starr Explore: Environment , Dr. Miller was founding director of the Office of Biotechnology at Food and Drug Administration during the 1980s and early 1990s and had a part in establishing the coordinated framework for the regulation of biotechnology in the US. org ===== ===== For Immediate Release 9 February 2001 Greenpeace demands false biotech advertising be removed from TV (Toronto) Greenpeace is filing a complaint with Advertising Standards Canada demanding that Greenpeace has spearheaded opposition to Golden Rice, which has the potential to reduce or eliminate much of the death and disease caused by a vitamin A deficiency (VAD), which has the greatest impact on the poorest people in Africa and Southeast Asia. Their main or only food is rice. Notably absent from the latest list of campaigners against Golden Rice is the international environmental group Greenpeace, which in the past has attracted severe criticism for its opposition to the project. My family and I formed the Allow Golden Rice Society and since then we have been campaigning for Golden Rice. When over a hundred Nobel Laureates in unison stand in ardent support of Golden Rice, you sit up and take notice. Perhaps Greenpeace's most effective argument, however, was that golden rice simply wouldn't work. Instead, antitechnology groups such as Greenpeace have given already risk-averse regulators the political cover to delay approvals. * Greenpeace refers to Golden Rice as “GE ‘Golden’ rice,” which I find clunky. November 3, 2012. The first golden rice, GR1, was unsuccessful and is long gone. 's Tax ID number is: 95-3313195. Though three other nations have approved golden rice, they might have a tough time Greenpeace's opposition to Golden rice not justified According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Vitamin A deficiency (VAD) is the leading cause of preventable blindness in children and increases the risk of disease and death from severe infections. European scientists devel- Greenpeace opposes the use of any patented genetically modified organisms in agriculture and opposes the cultivation of golden rice, because it will open the door to more widespread use of GMOs Reply Philo says: Bay Area scientists are among the 100-plus Nobel laureates urging Greenpeace to halt its campaign against the use of genetically engineered Golden Rice to address Vitamin A deficiencies in “Corporations are overhyping Golden Rice to pave the way for global approval of other more profitable genetically engineered crops,” Wilhelmina Pelegrina, a campaigner for Greenpeace Southeast Asia, told the Huffington Post. View source Approximately two million people each year die from vitamin A deficiency, and more suffer irreversible blindness. ” Jon Entine of ForbesAn interview with Dr Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace and renowned ecologist, who blew the whistle on Greenpeace to become a passionate proponent of Golden Rice. 'Golden' rice is a technical failure. Golden Rice Several times over the past couple years I’ve written about the amazing potential of so-called “golden rice. Greenpeace has staged public protests against Golden Rice, and it opposes all genetically modified organisms. ” They further argue that it is also environmentally irresponsible and could compromise food, nutrition and financial security. Golden Rice Project. greenpeace golden riceGolden rice is a variety of rice (Oryza sativa) produced through genetic engineering to . Opponents of this strategy, including Greenpeace, argue that Golden Rice and other genetically modified (GM) crops do not eliminate the true problem of poverty in the developing world [5]. Greenpeace has devoted itself to preventing GMOs, even golden rice. I called it “ activism at its best ” last year. is registered with the Internal Revenue Service as a 501(c)(3) entity and promotes Greenpeace's mission through public education and grants to other environmental organizations. Golden Rice Opponents Should Be Held Accountable for Health Problems Linked to Vitamain A Deficiency Society needs groups like Greenpeace and other environmental organizations to hold big Greenpeace has campaigned against golden rice for more than a decade, saying that it is an unnecessary diversion from the real causes of vitamin-A deficiency. Roberts accused Greenpeace of creating a culture of fear, and urged the environmental group to reverse its stance. Golden Rice made the news again this summer, when 107 Nobel laureates signed a letter urging Greenpeace to end its efforts to stop Golden Rice from coming onto the market. greenpeace golden rice However, Greenpeace and other like groups have taking on the Golden Rice fight as a standard bearer in their war on GMO crops and Moore is none too happy. The letter campaign was organised by Sir Richard John Roberts, a biochemist and molecular biologist with New England Biolabs, and Phillip Sharp, winner of the 1993 Nobel Prize. Golden rice 2 (GR2) is a patented pro-vitamin A GM rice developed from scratch by the multinational biotech firm Syngenta and still in the field trial stage at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) at least one decade after it’s creation. com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2016/06/Greenpeace has spearheaded opposition to Golden Rice, which has the potential to reduce or eliminate much of the death and disease caused by a vitamin A deficiency (VAD), which has the greatest impact on the poorest people in Africa and Southeast Asia. Enhancing the nutrients in the product that is already consumed the most is the most efficient solution. 14, 2013. Greenpeace has said the golden rice project is an attempt at finding a poster boy for the GM cause and says it opposes all releases of GM technology into the environment. The letter also singles out a specific engineered rice variety, Golden Rice, and asks Greenpeace “to cease and desist in its campaign against Golden Rice”. Will Golden Rice be effective at combating vitamin A deficiency? Ian Godwin, a professor of plant molecular genetics at the University of Queensland in Australia, said his review of the academic literature contradicts claims by Greenpeace and other groups that Golden Rice isn’t a good source of vitamin A. Tags: Greenpeace, GMO foods, Golden Rice scam (NaturalNews) Dozens of Nobel laureates have sent a letter to environmental activist group Greenpeace, pressing the organization to stop its opposition to genetically modified organisms (GMO) , claiming that the altered crops and foods are actually good for humans and the environment. Because Greenpeace is humanitarian and opposing Greenpeace is the least humanitarian thing imaginable. Ironically, in the same report that attacks Golden Rice, Greenpeace praises the success of bioengineered orange sweet potatoes in Mozambique. What Does Greenpeace Have Against Golden Rice? by Bradley Doucet Imagine if you stumbled across a naturally-occurring variety of rice that was rich in beta-carotene, a precursor to vitamin A found in carrots, pumpkins, and sweet potatoes. Helping to convince governments and the population as a whole the importance of protecting the rainforests and biodiversity, to Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore has taken on a herculean task; convincing Greenpeace to place innocent lives before radical ideology. Greenpeace calls itself “the world’s most visible environmental organization. In the long run these types of non-natural foods will cause a …Posted: 02/09/2001 By [email protected] Proponents portray golden rice as a technical, quick-fix solution to Vitamin A deficiency (VAD), a health problem in many developing countries. "So to be clear, we are talking about something that doesn't even exist," Greenpeace said in response to the letter. They are willing to put their zero-tolerance ideology ahead of a critical humanitarian mission. The real reason Greenpeace is opposed to Golden Rice is because it is generically modified and they can’t seem to imagine that even one beneficial crop might result from this technique. But to say that Golden Rice was “potentially dangerous ” is tantamount to over-egging the flan with every yolk in China. (Golden rice is being developed by a non-profit organization, not Monsanto. Greenpeace does not believe malnutrition will be solved by Golden Rice, and is therefore a failure (Golden Rice, 2005). So if Greenpeace is environmental and anti-gmo, doesn’t mean that both things are the same. The International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) has emphasised the non-commercial nature of their project, Greenpeace has spearheaded opposition to Golden Rice, which has the potential to reduce or eliminate much of the death and disease caused by a vitamin A deficiency (VAD), which has the greatest Without a doubt, Greenpeace has previously been a force for good. Greenpeace’s allegations were levelled against researchers from Tufts University in Boston, who had been workingGreenpeace has made a concerted effort to block Golden Rice’s introduction since it was announced in 2000. Golden rice did not attack the underlying problem of poverty, Greenpeace said; besides, other, better solutions to vitamin A deficiency existed. Health and Ethics. Golden Rice grain compared to white rice grain – Scientific American. Greenpeace opposes the use of any patented genetically modified Feb 13, 2018 The group echoes many of the worries about Golden Rice that environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs), led by Greenpeace, Greenpeace has led a global campaign to mislead consumers about GMOs and Golden Rice. Greenpeace continues to oppose Golden Rice Greenpeace has openly and aggressively spread misinformation about Golden Rice since it was first invented and has continued to do so at every opportunity. Greenpeace is a violent bully. After years of effort the Golden Rice Humanitarian Project, led by Dr. The textbook example of biofortification is Golden Rice, genetically engineered to contain high levels of the vitamin A precursor beta-carotene [4]. They do not have access to varied balanced diet that would give them the vital nutrients to stay healthy. The addition of beta-carotene to the rice is seen as preventative to loss of sight in poverty stricken Golden rice is the collective name of rice varieties that are genetically modified to counter vitamin A deficiency in developing countries. Because of this, Golden Rice’s creator, Ingo Potrykus actually went so far as to accuse Greenpeace of crimes against humanity. Currently Golden Rice Project has 16 national rice research institutions under the Golden Rice Humanitarian Board including those in Bangladesh, China, Indonesia, India, South Africa, The Philippines, and Vietnam. Fred Pearce makes the accusation that we at Greenpeace undermine our own case by supporting the “science” on climate change but not supporting it in the case of GM golden rice But this Golden rice has the potential to save the eyesight and lives of many of these people, but is has still not been widely adopted, primarily due to opposition to GMOs from groups such as Greenpeace Beta-carotene enriched Golden Rice is a much touted humanitarian solution to widespread Vitamin A deficiency in poor countries. greenpeace. Golden Rice, if given the chance, could help. In that time 20 million people, mostly children, have died. Beta carotene is used for vision and gene transcription by the human body; a shortage of beta carotene causes blindness in somewhere between 250,000 and 500,000 children a year, and kills about 670,000. As well, Greenpeace claims that Golden Rice may not be effective in delivering vitamin A to children, but it knows that Gwangwen Tang and her Greenpeace vs. Without a doubt, Greenpeace has previously been a force for good. Golden Illusion - The Broken Promises of GE 'Golden' Rice Published on Oct 17, 2013 GE ‘Golden’ rice is a genetically engineered rice variety developed by the biotech industry to produce pro The Allow Golden Rice Now! Campaign demands that Greenpeace and their allies discontinue their campaign of opposition to Golden Rice, which could eliminate vitamin A deficiency if cultivated and consumed. Perhaps Greenpeace's most effective argument, however, was that golden rice simply wouldn't work. MANILA, Philippines - Environmental group Greenpeace on Monday called on the Department of Agriculture to ban the genetically modified "Golden Rice" for commercial use. You would have to consume over 3300 grams of rice to achieve you daily intake of Vitamin A. Helping to convince governments and the population as a whole the importance of protecting the rainforests and biodiversity, to The real reason Greenpeace is opposed to Golden Rice is because it is generically modified and they can't seem to imagine that even one beneficial crop might result from this technique. Golden Rice was designed as a solution to vitamin A deficiency, which some 250 million people worldwide suffer from, including 40 percent of the children under 5 in the developing world, according to WHO statistics cited by the scientists. Ingo Portykus , genetically modified , GMO , golden rice , vitamin A Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) “Golden” rice is a genetically engineered (GE, also called genetically modified, GM) rice variety developed by the biotech industry to produce pro-vitamin A (beta-carotene). Greenpeace states that “genetically-engineered rice is a technological fix 23/03/2001 · The International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) was pleased that the international advocacy group Greenpeace took up its invitation for representatives to visit the institute on Monday, 19 March. Dr. They claim that there are better ways to alleviate vitamin A deficiency, such as vitamin pills and “home gardening”. Because of significant hierarchical changes, the mission has shifted significantly, and it has gone from one of protecting the environment towards a trend to promote causes …"Greenpeace has spearheaded opposition to Golden Rice, which has the potential to reduce or eliminate much of the death and disease caused by a vitamin A deficiency (VAD), which has the greatest Greenpeace also noted that the International Rice Research Institute has said that Golden Rice hasn't even been proven to actually improve vitamin A deficiency. Golden Rice as a humanitarian project Golden Rice was originally developed by a team of researchers led by Ingo Potrykus of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology and by Peter Beyer of the University of Freiburg in Germany. Their $300 million/year budget allows their influence to far outweigh smaller groups like GM Watch. Watch the Greenpeace documentary “All That Glitters Is Not Gold: The Truth About GE ‘Golden’ Rice. In fact, it may actually be an exercise in small farm empowerment. But the delay is mostly due to the very campaign Greenpeace and others have been waging. , an early member of Greenpeace and an outspoken, sometimes controversial, advocate of Golden Rice, is even more emphatic. However, I think this is going to backfire on Greenpeace and other NGO’s. Golden rice is a genetically engineered strain of rice that produces beta-carotene, a vitamin not normally found in rice. Greenpeace opposes the release of GE crops, including GE 'Golden' rice, into the environment. ” This is a genetically modified strain of rice that contains a relatively large amount of vitamin A. Similarly, GMO Golden Rice provides a source of vitamin A. Greenpeace has blocked Golden Rice using public pressure, and that is the only way they will be convinced to change their position and make an exception for Golden Rice. Moore was appointed Chair of Environmental Studies at the Frontier Centre for Public Policy. In 2017, it was approved for import by regulators in Australia, New Zealand, and Canada. One of the most high-profile opponents to Golden Rice is Greenpeace who argue that it “is a proposed but not practically viable crop solution that has never been brought to market. Golden Rice is back in the news. Greenpeace's opposition to Golden rice not justified Dr Patrick Moore, former Greenpeace activist explaining the importance of Golden Rice in Indian context on March 16, 2015 at Delhi According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Vitamin A deficiency (VAD) is the leading cause of preventable blindness in children and increases the risk of Greenpeace does not believe malnutrition will be solved by Golden Rice, and is therefore a failure (Golden Rice, 2005). And it had an especially good reason to be alarmed by this trial: It was a complete success. Golden Rice is a genetically modified rice producing beta-carotene (beta 22/01/2001 · Potrykus Responds to Greenpeace Criticism of 'Golden Rice' Following is the statement from Prof. Golden rice is a type of rice that has been genetically modified by the addition of two genes so that it will produce beta carotene, a precursor to vitamin A. 11/12/2012 · The new rice variety was produced by splicing two genes (one from the daffodil, which gives the rice its golden color, and one from a bacterium that helps the process along) into white rice …An interview with Dr Patrick Moore, co-founder of Greenpeace and renowned ecologist, who blew the whistle on Greenpeace to become a passionate proponent of Golden Rice. Genetically Modified Golden Rice: 15 Years of Failure By Nick Meyer On November 9, 2015 The controversy surrounding genetically modified organisms has been known to elicit strong emotions, and few have done so as much as GMO “golden rice,” a pet project of the Biotech industry. “Human guinea pigs”, “gambling with health” and “shadowy research project”—the terms came thick and fast in Greenpeace’s revelation about Golden Rice earlier this year. Greenpeace opposes the use of any patented genetically modified 30 Jun 2016 The Nobel winners singled out Golden Rice as a genetically modified crop with huge Greenpeace however hit back at the Nobel laureates. idea is idealistic. Their campaign against GMOs includes golden rice which has nothing to do with corporations or pesticides. "Industry tries to sell 'Golden' rice as a magic solution. " In Canada, it has filed a complaint against television commercials claiming that "Golden Rice could prevent blindness and infection in millions of children" to the Advertising Standards Committee. . With a protein from a simple daffodil, golden rice can end vitamin A deficiency in many countries. “Destroying test plots is a Greenpeace has long been an implacable opponent of genetically modified foods, especially Golden Rice. demonstrate” against an experimental field with golden rice. Greenpeace co-founder supports GMO Golden Rice. Golden Rice and Why You Should Not Fund Greenpeace Posted on May 21, 2015 in GMO , Golden Rice , Greenpeace , Sceptical/Debunking Videos , YouTube Videos // 3 Comments Without a doubt, Greenpeace has previously been a force for good. Greenpeace Fund, Inc. This comparison is not a simplistic <p>Patrick Moore, an original founding member of Greenpeace, is in a public fight with the group over it&#39;s anti-Golden Rice stance. In a separate post Why Greenpeace is Wrong about GMOs and Golden Rice, the campaign accuses Greenpeace of spearheading "opposition to golden rice, which has the potential to reduce or eliminate much of the death and disease caused by a vitamin A deficiency (VAD), which has the greatest impact on the poorest people in Africa and Southeast Asia. Greenpeace and their allies have claimed falsely that GMOS are 4 Jul 2016 Greenpeace is being attacked for 'crimes against humanity' by 100 Nobel laureates for blocking GMO 'golden' rice, reports Claire Robinson. A dissident Greenpeace founding member claims the environmentalist group has become “a force for evil” in its campaigns against GM golden rice. Greenpeace opposes the use of any patented genetically modified organisms in agriculture and opposes the cultivation of golden rice, claiming it will open the door to more widespread use of GMOs. The scientists at IRRI insist that there was no other way to get genes for beta-carotene Golden Rice Opponents Should Be Held Accountable for Health Problems Linked to Vitamain A Deficiency. Greenpeace’s allegations were levelled against researchers from Tufts University in Boston, who had been workingPosted: 02/09/2001 By [email protected] Governments must perceive additional costs that overcompensate the benefits of the technology to explain the delay in approval. Patrick Moore, a founding member of Greenpeace who has since left the organization, has condemned the group’s opposition to the “golden rice,” a strain of rice that is genetically enhanced to provide Vitamin A. The Golden Rice version submitted to FDA by IRRI, called event GR2E, is the only Golden Rice to have ever been submitted for regulatory approval. * Greenpeace refers to Golden Rice as “GE ‘Golden’ rice,” which I find clunky. Golden rice could thus make contributions to human health on a par with Jonas Salk’s polio vaccine. Greenpeace (2012), Golden Illusion: The Broken Promises of ‘Golden’ Rice, Amsterdam: Greenpeace International. “Two million children and many mothers …Greenpeace has said the golden rice project is an attempt at finding a poster boy for the GM cause and says it opposes all releases of GM technology into the environment. Patrick Moore rips ‘Greenpeace’s Crime Against Humanity’ for opposing Golden Rice which can eliminate vitamin A deficiency. And Golden Rice will at best - if it ever works - only tackle one of them, because the real solution to this is through a proper balanced diet, which projects like the home gardening initiatives in Bangladesh have developed, so that people don't just get one single nutrient improvement but they get nutrient improvement across the board. High enough to prevent VAD in these children. Greenpeace also maintains a dangerous opposition to DDT, which is one of the most important tools for fighting the deadly spread of malaria in the developing world. Beginning his career as a co-founder and activist in the Greenpeace movement, he became profoundly disenchanted by the direction that Greenpeace had detoured into. Not at first. A humanitarian effort started in 1990, Golden Environment Politics Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Climate Change golden rice Green New Deal Greenpeace Patrick Moore. Unmasking Golden Rice. Moore’s campaign extols the virtues of golden rice and takes Greenpeace to task. While Golden Rice has been opposed by Greenpeace and others as "Frankenfood", the World Health Organization notes that 18 million children have died due to vitamin A deficiency and At that rate, an average 2-year-old would need to eat 3 kilos of golden rice a day to reach the recommended daily intake, Greenpeace said, and a breastfeeding mother more than 6 kilos. Greenpeace’s allegations were levelled against researchers from Tufts University in Boston, who had been working Golden rice is a genetically engineered variety of rice (Oryza sativa). Since the invention of Golden Rice in 1998 between four million ARTICLE: Golden Rice: The GMO crop Greenpeace hates and humanitarians love The following is an excerpt of an article at the Genetic Literacy Project website giving an update on the latest news on Golden Rice . An organization called Greenpeace, vehemently opposes the production and use of golden rice citing this GMO will encourage the development of more GMOs in the future. Greenpeace is committing “crimes against humanity” by attempting to block the distribution of genetically-modified Golden Rice which could prevent the deaths of millions of children, said a Golden Rice field trials are currently being carried out in the Philippines under the auspices of the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), together with PhilRice, the local research body. Worse, it is drawing funding and attention away from the real solutions to combat the very real problem of vitamin A deficiency. Greenpeace opposes the planned use of golden rice, a variety of Oryza sativa rice produced through genetic engineering to biosynthesize beta-carotene, a precursor of pro-vitamin A in the edible parts of rice. Greenpeace and its allies have consistently opposed the introduction of Golden Rice for over a decade, claiming it may have “environmental and health risks” without ever elaborating on what those risks might be. 6ug of vitamin A per gram of rice. The Allow Golden Rice Society is actively campaigning for the approval of Golden Rice so it can be delivered to the 200 million children who are deficient in vitamin A. Greenpeace’s allegations were levelled against researchers from Tufts University in Boston, who had been working Golden rice could thus make contributions to human health on a par with Jonas Salk’s polio vaccine. I called it …While genetically modified golden rice could help alleviate famine and save thousands of children from malnourishment and visual impairments, this simple solution is strongly opposed by Greenpeace, which has initiated two misleading campaigns, two Swedish researchers wrote in an opinion piece. Without a doubt, Greenpeace has previously been a force for good. Despite a lack of evidence showing any ill effects in humans, Greenpeace holds a staunch position against Golden Rice. washingtonpost. Greenpeace’s allegations were levelled against researchers from Tufts University in Boston, who had been workingThey need new causes to keep fundraising humming along - and that has to be the reason they oppose Golden Rice. But the science telling us GM crops and foods are safe has been confirmed by vast experience. Potrykus Responds to Greenpeace Criticism of 'Golden Rice' Following is the statement from Prof